Harris Sliwoski: Thoughts on DEA’s Marijuana Rescheduling Hearing Announcement (Dec. 2)
Table of Contents Did you tell us so? Why are you telling us that you told us so? What can cannabis businesses do at this point? Did Biden muck things up? Are more delays on the horizon? What’s next for marijuana rescheduling? Yesterday, the Drug Enforcement...
Foley Hoag: The Hazy Landscape of Trademark Protection for Cannabis Products in the U.S.
August 22, 2024 By Danit Halberstein Categories: Advertising Navigating the cannabis industry’s legal landscape in the United States is like moving through an ever-evolving maze, especially in the world of intellectual property. As more states legalize cannabis for...
Seyfarth Shaw LLP: Bully for You: Cannabis Company Fails to Adequately Plead “Trademark Bullying” Defense Says the TTAB
Source: LexBlog In a recent precedential decision, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (the “Board”) found that Door Dash, Inc. (“Door Dash”) was merely doing what all trademark owners must do—protect their valuable rights. Door Dash, Inc. v. Greenerside Holdings,...
Chamberlains: Australia: Part 1: High Times – Cannabis Laws in the ACT explained
The laws surrounding cannabis use in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) have changed and here’s what you need to know. As of 31 January 2020, new legislation came into effect changing the rules about the possession and usage of cannabis for consumers over the age...
Duane Morris: Employers Must Engage in the Interactive Process with Medical Marijuana Users and Cannot Refuse to Hire a Job Applicant Based on Marijuana Use Alone.
Employers Must Engage in the Interactive Process with Medical Marijuana Users and Cannot Refuse to Hire a Job Applicant Based on Marijuana Use Alone. By: Kathleen O’Malley and Danielle Dwyer Recently, Attorney General Matthew J. Platkin announced a Finding of Probable...Top 200 Cannabis Lawyers
We Support