Holland & Knight: Congress Advances Cannabis and Hemp Proposals

JD Supra

 

Highlights

  • The U.S. Congress is moving forward with legislation that will change the regulation of hemp-derived products.
  • The hemp-derived cannabinoid market, conservatively valued at nearly $30 billion, could see changes as early as this fall, although it’s more likely to be in the first quarter of 2025.

 

Recent congressional activity highlights the changing environment for cannabis regulation. Specifically, U.S. Congress is moving forward with legislation that will change the regulation of hemp-derived products. The industry could see changes as early as this fall, although it’s more likely to be in the first quarter of 2025.

The Farm Bill Reauthorization

The Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 (the 2018 Farm Bill) amended the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) to exclude certain products from the definition of marijuana. Specifically, the Act defines hemp as “the plant Cannabis sativa L. and any part of that plant, including the seeds thereof and all derivatives, extracts, cannabinoids, isomers, acids, salts and salts of isomers, whether growing or not, with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis.”

This definition in the 2018 Farm Bill removed hemp with 0.3 percent or less of THC from the CSA, which in practice means that cannabidiol (CBD) that meets the definition of hemp is not considered a controlled substance. Although Congress’ intent is generally understood to have been the legalization of hemp production (for textiles and nonintoxicating supplements) for the first time in more than a century, the 2018 Farm Bill language admittedly did not foresee the creation of the hemp-derived cannabinoid market, now conservatively valued at $28.4 billion.1

The Farm Bill is now up for reauthorization, which happens approximately every five years. The U.S. House of Representatives’ version of the 2024 Farm Bill contains language that modifies these provisions. Specifically, it now contains provisions that clarify the types of hemp cannabinoid products that would be considered lawful. The bill would redefine the existing statutory definition of hemp by replacing language basing the legal limits for hemp on its delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (delta-9 THC) concentration and instead basing the definition on hemp’s “total tetrahydrocannabinol (including tetrahydrocannabinol acid (THCA]) [Total THC] concentration.” Other statutory language regarding hemp “derivatives, extracts, cannabinoids, isomers, acids, salts, and salts of isomers, whether growing or not” would remain unchanged.

In addition, at the House Committee on Agriculture’s late-May markup of the Farm Bill reauthorization language, an amendment was passed that changed the definition of hemp in federal law to only include naturally occurring, naturally derived and nonintoxicating cannabinoids. (See Holland & Knight’s previous alert, “House Agriculture Committee Completes Markup of 2024 Farm Bill,” May 28, 2024.) The bill as amended does not define “intoxicating,” however, it would prohibit hemp cannabinoid products with “quantifiable amounts” of Total THC (including THCA) or any other cannabinoids that have (or are marketed to have) “similar effects on humans or animals” as THC, as determined by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).

Although the U.S. Senate version of the 2024 Farm Bill has not yet been released, it is clear Congress is looking to resolve, in some fashion, issues related to THC production resulting from the 2018 Farm Bill.

Fiscal Year 2025 Appropriations Bills

The Agriculture-FDA Appropriations legislation for fiscal year 2025 also contains language addressing hemp. The House bill contains language similar to the 2024 Farm Bill proposals that further refines the federal definition of hemp to only include naturally occurring, naturally derived and nonintoxicating cannabinoids and excludes those with “quantifiable amounts” of Total THC.

The recently released Senate version of the Agriculture-FDA funding bill contains no provisions related to hemp and cannabinoids. The full Senate will vote on the bill in the coming weeks. Provisions could be added when the bill is debated by the full Senate, but the most likely outcome is that House and Senate negotiators will work toward finding a solution before final passage this year.

Congressional action on the Farm Bill and the appropriations process are significant because they become effective upon enactment – which could be as early as this fall. Thus, they will become legally binding before the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) publishes its final regulation on the rescheduling of marijuana.

Holland & Knight will continue to closely monitor these developments.

Notes

1 2023 U.S. National Cannabinoid Report, Whitney Economics

https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/congress-advances-cannabis-and-hemp-5541083/

Top 200 Cannabis Lawyers

We Support

Cannabis Law Journal – Contributing Authors

Editor – Sean Hocking

Author Bios

Canada
Matt Maurer – Minden Gross
Jeff Hergot – Wildboer Dellelce LLP

Costa Rica
Tim Morales – The Cannabis Industry Association Costa Rica

Nicaragua
Elvin Rodríguez Fabilena

USA

General
Julie Godard
Carl L Rowley -Thompson Coburn LLP

Arizona
Jerry Chesler – Chesler Consulting

California
Ian Stewart – Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Otis Felder – Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Lance Rogers – Greenspoon Marder – San Diego
Jessica McElfresh -McElfresh Law – San Diego
Tracy Gallegos – Partner – Fox Rothschild

Colorado
Adam Detsky – Knight Nicastro
Dave Rodman – Dave Rodman Law Group
Peter Fendel – CMR Real Estate Network
Nate Reed – CMR Real Estate Network

Florida
Matthew Ginder – Greenspoon Marder
David C. Kotler – Cohen Kotler

Illinois
William Bogot – Fox Rothschild

Massachusetts
Valerio Romano, Attorney – VGR Law Firm, PC

Nevada
Neal Gidvani – Snr Assoc: Greenspoon Marder
Phillip Silvestri – Snr Assoc: Greenspoon Marder

Tracy Gallegos – Associate Fox Rothschild

New Jersey

Matthew G. Miller – MG Miller Intellectual Property Law LLC
Daniel T. McKillop – Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

New York
Gregory J. Ryan, Esq. Tesser, Ryan & Rochman, LLP
Tim Nolen Tesser, Ryan & Rochman, LLP
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Oregon
Paul Loney & Kristie Cromwell – Loney Law Group
William Stewart – Half Baked Labs

Pennsylvania
Andrew B. Sacks – Managing Partner Sacks Weston Diamond
William Roark – Principal Hamburg, Rubin, Mullin, Maxwell & Lupin
Joshua Horn – Partner Fox Rothschild

Washington DC
Teddy Eynon – Partner Fox Rothschild