Rod Kight: Yes, the Hemp Industry Wants Reasonable Regulations

Earlier this week I published an article calling out CANNRA, a marijuana association, for behavior that is anti-cannabis and prohibitionist. While my claim may seem hyperbolic, and even caused one of my friends to inquire if it was “satire”, the premise of the article is that “hemp” is “cannabis”, and attempts to prohibit access to it, either directly by prohibition or indirectly by over-regulating it to extinction, are, by definition, “anti-cannabis” and “prohibitionist”. With respect to CANNRA, for the reasons I discussed in the article, its proposals to Congress would effectively destroy the entire hemp industry. Given the hemp industry constitutes an enormous portion of the “cannabis industry”, employs thousands of people, and provides access to cannabis products across the country, making proposals that would kill it off is decidedly anti-cannabis. At this point in time the hemp sector of the cannabis industry is probably larger than the marijuana sector. At a minimum, it serves more Americans. Additionally, my article addresses the false notion that the hemp CPG sector of the industry, which produces and distributes cannabinoid products, was an unintended outcome of the 2018 Farm Bill. In fact, the hemp CPG industry was very much anticipated, and the idea that the CPG sector is the result of a “loophole” in the 2018 Farm Bill is entirely false.

This article follows up on my prior article and addresses two additional misconceptions about the hemp industry: (a) that it is “unregulated”, and (b) that the industry does not favor regulation. Both of these notions are patently false, yet they are repeatedly used by anti-cannabis associations, including marijuana lobbyists such as CANNRA, to further their interest in shutting down the hemp industry and creating a highly restrictive monopoly for MSOs and other corporate marijuana interests in the cannabinoid trade. In reality, and as I will discuss in this article, the hemp industry is subject to numerous regulations. Moreover, the hemp industry favors reasonable federal regulations.

The Hemp Industry Is Highly Regulated

The hemp industry is subject to numerous regulations. Aside from hemp production, which is regulated by the USDA either directly or via USDA-required approval of state hemp plans, every state in the country has laws regarding hemp. Most states also regulate hemp products. Some states, such as California, Colorado, and Oregon (to name a few), have very detailed hemp regulations that are much more stringent than federal regulations for their similar non-cannabis product categories (i.e., foods, dietary supplements, etc.) Other states, including, but not limited to Florida, Tennessee, and Texas have detailed but less stringent regulations. A number of states regulate hemp more generally, including Alabama, Indiana, Louisiana, and Washington. To be clear, I am not making value judgments about any of these states’ regulatory schemes, nor am I being comprehensive. The point I am making is that hemp and hemp products are subject to regulations of some sort, often stringent regulations, on a state by state level.

A hemp company that distributes products nationally, or even regionally, must deal with a large number of compliance hurdles, including state laws that directly contradict other state’s laws, labeling requirements that are well beyond any labeling requirements under federal law, analytical testing, permitting, advertising, and age restrictions. Additionally, more and more states are imposing hemp-specific taxes. On top of this web of sometimes conflicting regulations, law enforcement is often behind the curve and lawful hemp operators constantly live in fear of an unfounded, but stressful and expensive, raid of their businesses. Additionally, the claim that hemp is “merely” regulated at the state level undercuts all of the arguments regarding regulation promulgated by the marijuana industry since marijuana is federally illegal and is thus solely regulated by the states. This is particularly true since at the federal level the FDA, the USDA, and the FTC (not to mention the DEA) have all flexed their regulatory muscles at the hemp industry during its decade-long evolution. In short, the claim that the hemp industry is “unregulated” is simply false. Most of my time is spent advising clients on how to stay compliant with the patchwork of state and federal regulations governing the hemp industry.

The Hemp Industry Desires Reasonable Federal Regulations

The hemp industry is often portrayed as populated by greedy “cowboys” who despise regulation and will do anything they can to sell contaminated bathtub gin products to unassuming consumers and to minors. In the popular trope, the hemp industry abhors and shuns regulations. This view is entirely unfounded. In nearly a decade of representing hemp companies, I have been fortunate to represent many of the largest and most well-known ones in the world, all of which would be known to readers of this blog and many of which would be known even to the average person on the street. I have also enjoyed representing hundreds of small, mostly unknown hemp companies founded and operated by regular people who are following their dream of owning a business and expanding cannabis access to their fellow Americans. Additionally, I have been privileged to represent and interact with many hemp associations and attorneys who represent hemp companies throughout the US. The common denominator of all of these people and companies is a desire to be subject to a single set of reasonable regulations. I am not aware of a single client of mine, or any other hemp executive, who does not agree with the statement, “The hemp industry should be subject to reasonable regulations regarding safety and access by minors.” Sure, cowboys exist in every industry, including the marijuana industry, but in the legitimate hemp industry everyone is like-minded on this point.

What are “reasonable regulations”? First, and just like any other CPG industry, the hemp CPG sector should be subject to regulations regarding the quality and purity of its products. Moreover, marketing and labeling of hemp products should be uniform and provide the consumer with sufficient information about a product to make an informed decision about whether to purchase it and how to consume it. These types of regulations already exist for foods, dietary supplements, and “vice” products such as alcohol and tobacco. The hemp industry wants to be treated the same way with respect to quality control and marketing – no more; no less.

Second, access to hemp products by minors should be restricted. There is a lot of focus on “intoxicating” versus “non-intoxicating” products, but as I discuss in an article you can read by clicking here, classifying hemp products based on potential for intoxication is a fool’s errand. Rather, all hemp products, with perhaps the exception of CBD isolate topicals, should be subject to age-gating, with the proviso that a minor’s parent or guardian can purchase a hemp product for the minor’s use and also provide authorization to third parties regarding its use by the minor. I recognize that this proposal will annoy many people, but it is simple and avoids messy distinctions that are difficult to articulate and mostly unfounded in science, tricky regulations, and an overall regulatory structure that will be resource-intensive and, frankly, unnecessary. Distributors should be required to age-gate, but minors who need hemp cannabinoids should be able to access them with parental/guardian consent. I will also say that there are other ways to restrict access by minors and that my proposal is up for negotiation. Remember, however, that the point of this article is not to propose a detailed regulatory regime. Rather, it is to make it clear that the hemp industry as a whole agrees with age-gating and regulations regarding safety and quality.

A Short Note About Convenience Stores

Finally, I’d like to make a side-comment about the sale of hemp products in convenience stores. I frequently hear the claim that “hemp products are sold in convenience stores” used as an argument about how bad and unregulated the hemp industry is. This is a red-herring. Of all the possible distribution outlets for hemp products, convenience stores are among the best. Convenience stores have been selling highly regulated products such as alcohol and tobacco that are subject to strict age-gating for decades. To be clear, I am in favor of all sorts of properly-regulated distribution outlets for hemp products, from ecommerce sites to boutique hemp wellness centers. However, to claim that the hemp industry is somehow bad and unregulated because its products are sold at convenience stores, which are highly regulated and frequently subject to agency audits, licenses, high fines, and even criminal action if certain products are sold to minors, is ridiculous. The “convenience store” argument against hemp should die because it is totally unfounded.


The hemp industry has been the subject of a smear campaign based on unfounded allegations that it is unregulated and that it opposes regulations. Both of these claims are untrue. The hemp industry is highly regulated by both federal and state laws. Additionally, the hemp industry favors reasonable regulations regarding product safety, consumer safety, and access by minors. Reasonable people can differ on how these types of regulations should be written, but they are necessary and welcomed by the hemp industry. Finally, the particular distribution outlet for hemp products is immaterial provided that hemp products are properly and uniformly regulated for quality and safety and access by minors is restricted. To claim that an industry is unregulated and illegitimate because its products are sold at convenience stores, which happen to be some of the most regulated distribution outlets in the US, is a ridiculous argument that needs to be put to rest.

Hemp is cannabis and cannabis should be subject to reasonable regulations regarding quality, safety, and access by minors so that all consenting adults can have the access they need and all Americans who desire to operate a legally-compliant hemp business can take part in the burgeoning cannabis industry.

September 27, 2023



Rod Kight is an international cannabis lawyer. He represents businesses throughout the cannabis industry. Additionally, Rod speaks at cannabis conferences, drafts and presents legislation to foreign governments, is regularly quoted on cannabis matters in the media, and is the editor of the Kight on Cannabis legal blog, which discusses legal issues affecting the cannabis industry. You can contact him by clicking here

Top 200 Cannabis Lawyers

We Support

Cannabis Law Journal – Contributing Authors

Editor – Sean Hocking

Author Bios

Matt Maurer – Minden Gross
Jeff Hergot – Wildboer Dellelce LLP

Costa Rica
Tim Morales – The Cannabis Industry Association Costa Rica

Elvin Rodríguez Fabilena


Julie Godard
Carl L Rowley -Thompson Coburn LLP

Jerry Chesler – Chesler Consulting

Ian Stewart – Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Otis Felder – Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Lance Rogers – Greenspoon Marder – San Diego
Jessica McElfresh -McElfresh Law – San Diego
Tracy Gallegos – Partner – Fox Rothschild

Adam Detsky – Knight Nicastro
Dave Rodman – Dave Rodman Law Group
Peter Fendel – CMR Real Estate Network
Nate Reed – CMR Real Estate Network

Matthew Ginder – Greenspoon Marder
David C. Kotler – Cohen Kotler

William Bogot – Fox Rothschild

Valerio Romano, Attorney – VGR Law Firm, PC

Neal Gidvani – Snr Assoc: Greenspoon Marder
Phillip Silvestri – Snr Assoc: Greenspoon Marder

Tracy Gallegos – Associate Fox Rothschild

New Jersey

Matthew G. Miller – MG Miller Intellectual Property Law LLC
Daniel T. McKillop – Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

New York
Gregory J. Ryan, Esq. Tesser, Ryan & Rochman, LLP
Tim Nolen Tesser, Ryan & Rochman, LLP
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Paul Loney & Kristie Cromwell – Loney Law Group
William Stewart – Half Baked Labs

Andrew B. Sacks – Managing Partner Sacks Weston Diamond
William Roark – Principal Hamburg, Rubin, Mullin, Maxwell & Lupin
Joshua Horn – Partner Fox Rothschild

Washington DC
Teddy Eynon – Partner Fox Rothschild