The High Lights of California Cannabis Regulation May 2018

Authored By : Jonathan Storper – Partner

 

 

The Medical and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (“MAUCRSA” ), which became effective January 1, 2018, is the governing law for both medical and adult use of cannabis in California. The rules are complex. Cannabis businesses seeking to do business in California should consult with an attorney prior to engaging in any project to ensure full understanding of the most up-to-date rules.

Regulatory Agencies

The Bureau of Marijuana Control (“Bureau”) oversees cannabis transportation, storage, distribution, sales, and testing. The Department of Food and Agriculture, through its CalCannabis Cultivation licensing program, oversees cannabis cultivation, issues plant tags, and is developing and implementing the track and trace program. The State Department of Public Health, through its Office of Manufactured Cannabis Safety (“OMCS”), oversees cannabis manufacturers. Finally, there are additional state agencies with smaller roles, such as the Department of Pesticides, the California State Board of Equalization, the State Water Resources Control Board, the Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Department of Justice, and state law enforcement. These State agencies promulgated emergency regulations effective through June 31, 2018 which they have now proposed be extended as amended through December 31, 2018.

Important Provisions

  • Obtaining a state license requires a local jurisdiction permit to operate. Local jurisdictions are not required to permit cannabis businesses. While there is no residency requirement to own or operate a medicinal or adult-use cannabis business at the state level, local jurisdictions may attempt to impose residency restrictions. Colocation of medical and adult use/means are permitted.
  • Vertical integration is permitted and there are no limitations on how many licenses a person may hold, except testing labs must remain separate from all other license types. Local governments may attempt to impose their own limits on how many licenses someone can own. Any license type, other than a testing licensee, may hold a distributor license.
  • Ownership is defined as any person or entity owning a twenty percent or greater stake, or any person with the power to control management decisions. Owners are subject to background investigation. Additional financial interests, as defined, must be disclosed.
  • Licensees may also seek issuance of a temporary event license to operate at a county fair or district agricultural association event, which would permit on-site cannabis consumption, provided there is no local jurisdictional ban and the licensee complies with certain other requirements (i.e., no alcohol or tobacco consumption would be allowed on premises, customers must be over twenty-one, etc.). Retailers must separately report on state designated fairground sales beginning July 1, 2018.
  • California requires testing of cannabis for pesticides, mold, mildew, and other contaminants and explicitly prohibits the use of banned pesticides and sets standards for certification of organic cannabis. Businesses may be allowed to sell untested products, if labeled “untested,” for a set period of time to prevent delays or interruptions in product availability. Cannabis and cannabis products must be packaged in opaque packaging and identify infused edibles with a created universal symbol.
  • Cultivators must identify their water source and obtain all necessary state and local permits for water usage. The Department of Food and Agriculture has the authority to limit the issuance of unique identifying tags (required for all legally grown plants) if there are adverse impacts to the environment caused by the cultivation. Growing or processing cannabis where these activities result in a violation of specified laws relating to the unlawful taking of fish and wildlife is a felony.
  • Microbusinesses need a license from the Bureau, as well as approval from Departments of Food & Agriculture and Public Health.
  • Appellation of origin standards will be established by January 1, 2021.
  • Medicinal ID cards are issued at the county level.
  • MAUCRSA imposed online advertising restrictions in addition to the prior laws governing advertising, adulteration, and misbranding restrictions; including no depictions of minors under 18 years of age.
  • There are increased opportunities for tax collection at the state and local level. Tax levels may vary by local jurisdiction.
  • MAUCRSA protected assets of licensed operators and building owners.
  • MAUCRSA provided three million dollars to fund DUI impairment training and research.
  • No Type 5, 5A, or 5B licenses will be issued prior to January 1, 2023.
  • License fees differ between types and even within sublicense types so it is important to check the most up-to-date fees online.
  • Social Equity programs provide opportunities for those with low incomes, or that live in an area impacted by the War on Drugs, have criminal records because of past cannabis prohibition and who plan to hire local workforce personnel, and other possible criteria, to obtain priority local permits, but check local jurisdictions for specifics as they vary.

Licensing

License Type Size Notes
Type 1 —Cultivation — Specialty Outdoor; Small Up to 5,000 sq. ft.; up to 50 mature plants No artificial light
Type 1A— Cultivation — Specialty Indoor; Small 501- 5,000 sq. ft. Artificial light
Type 1B —Cultivation — Specialty Mixed-Light; Small 2,501- 5,000 sq. it Combination of natural and artificial light
Type 1C — Cultivation — Specialty Cottage; Small Up to 2500 sq. ft for mixed light, up to 25 outdoor mature plants, or 500 sq. ft. of indoor cultivation Combination of natural and artificial light, all on one premise
Type 2 —Cultivation — Small Outdoor 5,001-10,000 sq. ft. No artificial light
Type 2A— Cultivation— Small Indoor 5,001-10,000 sq. ft. Artificial light
Type 2B — Cultivation — Small Mixed-Light 5,001-10,000 sq. ft. Combination of natural and artificial light
Type 3 − Cultivation — Outdoor; Medium 10,001 sq. ft. — 1 acre No artificial light
Type 3A −Cultivation — Indoor; Medium 10,001 sq. ft. — 22,000 sq. ft. Artificial light
Type 3B−Cultivation — Mixed-Light; Medium 10,001 sq. ft. — 22,000 sq. ft. Combination of natural and artificial light
Type 4 − Cultivation; Nursery No size designation currently available Producing clones, immature plants, and seeds
Type 5 − Cultivation; Large Outdoor + 22,000 sq. ft. No artificial light
Type 5A− Cultivation; Large Indoor + 22,000 sq. ft. Artificial light
Type 5B − Cultivation; Large Mixed-Light + 22,000 sq. ft. Combination of natural and artificial light
Type 6−Manufacturer 1 No size restrictions Using non-volatile solvents
Type 7−Manufacturer 2 No size restrictions Using volatile solvents
Type 8 −Testing Laboratory No size restrictions Cannot own any other license type
Type 9 −Non Storefront Retailer Licensed premises Sells & delivers cannabis products
exclusively by delivery
Type 10− Storefront Retailer Licensed premises
No size restrictions
Sells cannabis products; open to public; may deliver
Type 11−Distributer No size restrictions Distributes cannabis products between producers and retailers
Type 12− Microbusinesses Up to 10,000 sq. ft of cultivation, no size restrictions on distributor and retailer license types under this category Must do at least 3 of these:

-Cultivation

-Manufacture

-Distribution

-Retail

Type 13− Distributor Transport Distributor Transport Only
Type 14− Event Organizer Cannabis event organizer
Type – Temp Cannabis Event Up to 4 days; allows onsite sale and consumption
Type N – Infusions Infusions (Ex.: using pre-extracted oils to create edibles, beverages, capsules, vape cartridges, tinctures or topicals
Type P – Packaging Packaging and labeling only
Type S – Shared Space Product Types: edibles, concentrates, topicals, capsules, vape cartridges, tinctures, other products

Activities: Extraction, infusion, packaging and labeling

Extraction method: Butter and food-grade oil only

Type – Processor Trimming, drying, curing, grading,
and packaging and labeling of non-
manufactured cannabis products

Priority Grant of Licenses

Businesses that were operating in compliance with state law before September 1, 2016, will have priority during licensing. Cannabis businesses that were lawfully operating under California state law and with relevant local licensing before January 1, 2018, may continue operating while their applications are reviewed. The Bureau will determine whether an applicant was lawfully operating by reviewing the date on which the applicant began actively conducting the same commercial cannabis activity as the license type for which the applicant is applying, and evidence to prove compliant operations.

Medicinal cannabis businesses who opt not to apply for a state license on or before January 1, 2018, will continue to receive protections from criminal prosecution provided by state law for one year after the first state licenses are issued. However, criminal defenses do not provide protections from state regulatory enforcement beginning January 1, 2018, thereby exposing businesses operating under the prior collective or cooperative model to the risks of civil or regulatory enforcement if they continue to operate without a state or local license after January 1, 2018. In the spring of 2019, operators without a license will likely no longer be able to assert defenses to criminal prosecution under the collective or cooperative model.

Prior law required that cannabis operations be solely operated under a non-profit model. There are numerous hurdles for businesses operating under the prior law to transition to a fully regulated for profit model. Transition to a for profit model is complex. Competent California counsel should be consulted with a deep knowledge of the industry and regulatory scheme.

© Jonathan Storper

Jonathan S. Storper

Partner

Hanson Bridgett LLP

(415) 995-5040 Direct

(415) 995-3466 Fax

jstorper@hansonbridgett.com

Hanson Bridgett LLP

425 Market Street, 26th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94105

Top 200 Cannabis Lawyers

We Support

Cannabis Law Journal – Contributing Authors

Editor – Sean Hocking

Author Bios

Canada
Matt Maurer – Minden Gross
Jeff Hergot – Wildboer Dellelce LLP

Costa Rica
Tim Morales – The Cannabis Industry Association Costa Rica

Nicaragua
Elvin Rodríguez Fabilena

USA

General
Julie Godard
Carl L Rowley -Thompson Coburn LLP

Arizona
Jerry Chesler – Chesler Consulting

California
Ian Stewart – Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Otis Felder – Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Lance Rogers – Greenspoon Marder – San Diego
Jessica McElfresh -McElfresh Law – San Diego
Tracy Gallegos – Partner – Fox Rothschild

Colorado
Adam Detsky – Knight Nicastro
Dave Rodman – Dave Rodman Law Group
Peter Fendel – CMR Real Estate Network
Nate Reed – CMR Real Estate Network

Florida
Matthew Ginder – Greenspoon Marder
David C. Kotler – Cohen Kotler

Illinois
William Bogot – Fox Rothschild

Massachusetts
Valerio Romano, Attorney – VGR Law Firm, PC

Nevada
Neal Gidvani – Snr Assoc: Greenspoon Marder
Phillip Silvestri – Snr Assoc: Greenspoon Marder

Tracy Gallegos – Associate Fox Rothschild

New Jersey

Matthew G. Miller – MG Miller Intellectual Property Law LLC
Daniel T. McKillop – Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

New York
Gregory J. Ryan, Esq. Tesser, Ryan & Rochman, LLP
Tim Nolen Tesser, Ryan & Rochman, LLP
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Oregon
Paul Loney & Kristie Cromwell – Loney Law Group
William Stewart – Half Baked Labs

Pennsylvania
Andrew B. Sacks – Managing Partner Sacks Weston Diamond
William Roark – Principal Hamburg, Rubin, Mullin, Maxwell & Lupin
Joshua Horn – Partner Fox Rothschild

Washington DC
Teddy Eynon – Partner Fox Rothschild