Green Light Law Group: Disturbing Trend: Hemp Landlords Increasingly Subjected to Criminal Prosecution

Disturbing Trend: Hemp Landlords Increasingly Subjected to Criminal Prosecution

 

In my last post regarding the rise of civil asset forfeiture in Oregon’s ongoing war on cannabis, I noted some commonalities in law enforcement’s approach to civil forfeiture of land allegedly used to grow illegal cannabis, namely that the landowner leased the property to a third party for the express purpose of growing legal hemp. Since that post, I have become aware of an additional and more disturbing trend: law enforcement is also charging the landowners with crimes.

In the cases I am aware of in this genre, which arise primarily in southern and central Oregon counties, law enforcement and prosecutors are undeterred by the fact that the landowners took pains to protect themselves in their written leases, which generally prohibits the use of their land for anything other than lawful and permitted hemp production, often with the assistance of counsel. Many prosecutors describe the leases as mere paperwork meant to obscure a criminal conspiracy. In other cases, prosecutors are going to great lengths to not only charge landowners with crimes in connection with the conduct they allege their tenants engaged in, they are also seizing any and all of the landowners’ bank accounts, including those that have no connection whatsoever to the operations on the land that they allege are illegal grows. The Madras Pioneer wrote about one such case last month.

Is it illegal to lease land to a licensed hemp grower? As a matter of law, the answer is clearly no. But in practice, Oregon law enforcement appears to be putting the squeeze on landowners by roping them into criminal culpability based on vague allegations of a conspiracy with their tenants. It is unclear how Oregon landowners can protect themselves in this seemingly escalating war on cannabis, but the purpose of these efforts is clear: local law enforcement, prosecutors, and other officials simply want to make their jurisdictions inhospitable to cannabis grows, regardless of legality.

You can contact Kevin Jacoby at info@gl-lg.com or (503) 488-5424.

https://greenlightlawgroup.com/blog/disturbing-trend-hemp-landlords-increasingly-subjected-to-criminal-prosecution

Top 200 Cannabis Lawyers

We Support

Cannabis Law Journal – Contributing Authors

Editor – Sean Hocking

Author Bios

Canada
Matt Maurer – Minden Gross
Jeff Hergot – Wildboer Dellelce LLP

Costa Rica
Tim Morales – The Cannabis Industry Association Costa Rica

Nicaragua
Elvin Rodríguez Fabilena

USA

General
Julie Godard
Carl L Rowley -Thompson Coburn LLP

Arizona
Jerry Chesler – Chesler Consulting

California
Ian Stewart – Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Otis Felder – Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Lance Rogers – Greenspoon Marder – San Diego
Jessica McElfresh -McElfresh Law – San Diego
Tracy Gallegos – Partner – Fox Rothschild

Colorado
Adam Detsky – Knight Nicastro
Dave Rodman – Dave Rodman Law Group
Peter Fendel – CMR Real Estate Network
Nate Reed – CMR Real Estate Network

Florida
Matthew Ginder – Greenspoon Marder
David C. Kotler – Cohen Kotler

Illinois
William Bogot – Fox Rothschild

Massachusetts
Valerio Romano, Attorney – VGR Law Firm, PC

Nevada
Neal Gidvani – Snr Assoc: Greenspoon Marder
Phillip Silvestri – Snr Assoc: Greenspoon Marder

Tracy Gallegos – Associate Fox Rothschild

New Jersey

Matthew G. Miller – MG Miller Intellectual Property Law LLC
Daniel T. McKillop – Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

New York
Gregory J. Ryan, Esq. Tesser, Ryan & Rochman, LLP
Tim Nolen Tesser, Ryan & Rochman, LLP
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Oregon
Paul Loney & Kristie Cromwell – Loney Law Group
William Stewart – Half Baked Labs

Pennsylvania
Andrew B. Sacks – Managing Partner Sacks Weston Diamond
William Roark – Principal Hamburg, Rubin, Mullin, Maxwell & Lupin
Joshua Horn – Partner Fox Rothschild

Washington DC
Teddy Eynon – Partner Fox Rothschild