Parker Poe: New California Law Will Prohibit Employment Discrimination Based on Off-duty Marijuana Use

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

 

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

Some of the first states that legalized the use of medical or recreational marijuana did so with warnings to users that state law provided no protections from drug testing or loss of employment due to the presence of marijuana in such test results. As legal marijuana use in these states has become normalized, some are reconsidering whether it makes sense to allow such use while still subjecting workers to the loss of their jobs.

Last week, California Governor Gavin Newsome signed legislation that will prohibit California employers from discriminating against applicants or employees due to off-duty marijuana use. The new measure, which takes effect on January 1, 2024, means that the mere presence of marijuana in an employee’s system, or their admission of use away from work, cannot serve as the basis for disciplinary action.

The new law contains a few important exceptions. First, it does not affect employers’ ability to use pre-employment testing to identify and exclude persons based on the presence of psychoactive cannabis metabolites. Most current drug tests identify non-psychoactive metabolites, and the law is unclear on exactly what tests can be used for this purpose. Presumably, these tests would measure impairment at the time of testing.

The law also excludes the construction and building trades industries from the new prohibitions. It does not change limitations on employee drug testing already in place under California law. The law also does not apply to workers subject to federal drug testing or use requirements.

Other states that legalized marijuana some time ago may follow this example. States that have more recently passed marijuana legalization laws are more likely to address this issue up front, setting forth in the legalization legislation employers’ ability to exclude users from the workplace.

 

Source: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/new-california-law-will-prohibit-9448194/

Top 200 Cannabis Lawyers

We Support

Cannabis Law Journal – Contributing Authors

Editor – Sean Hocking

Author Bios

Canada
Matt Maurer – Minden Gross
Jeff Hergot – Wildboer Dellelce LLP

Costa Rica
Tim Morales – The Cannabis Industry Association Costa Rica

Nicaragua
Elvin Rodríguez Fabilena

USA

General
Julie Godard
Carl L Rowley -Thompson Coburn LLP

Arizona
Jerry Chesler – Chesler Consulting

California
Ian Stewart – Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Otis Felder – Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Lance Rogers – Greenspoon Marder – San Diego
Jessica McElfresh -McElfresh Law – San Diego
Tracy Gallegos – Partner – Fox Rothschild

Colorado
Adam Detsky – Knight Nicastro
Dave Rodman – Dave Rodman Law Group
Peter Fendel – CMR Real Estate Network
Nate Reed – CMR Real Estate Network

Florida
Matthew Ginder – Greenspoon Marder
David C. Kotler – Cohen Kotler

Illinois
William Bogot – Fox Rothschild

Massachusetts
Valerio Romano, Attorney – VGR Law Firm, PC

Nevada
Neal Gidvani – Snr Assoc: Greenspoon Marder
Phillip Silvestri – Snr Assoc: Greenspoon Marder

Tracy Gallegos – Associate Fox Rothschild

New Jersey

Matthew G. Miller – MG Miller Intellectual Property Law LLC
Daniel T. McKillop – Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

New York
Gregory J. Ryan, Esq. Tesser, Ryan & Rochman, LLP
Tim Nolen Tesser, Ryan & Rochman, LLP
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Oregon
Paul Loney & Kristie Cromwell – Loney Law Group
William Stewart – Half Baked Labs

Pennsylvania
Andrew B. Sacks – Managing Partner Sacks Weston Diamond
William Roark – Principal Hamburg, Rubin, Mullin, Maxwell & Lupin
Joshua Horn – Partner Fox Rothschild

Washington DC
Teddy Eynon – Partner Fox Rothschild