Pennington & Zorn On Drugs Blog : New DEA Rules for 2024? A Peek at the Unified Agenda

Hang around here long enough and you’ll inevitably read some rant I’ve written about the lack of transparency in federal drug policy and regulatory affairs.

But there is one aspect of this regulatory rigmarole that is semi-transparent: the “Unified Agenda” of Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA).

OIRA is an office within the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) that assesses the impact of rules proposed by agencies. Anyone who wants to keep tabs on potential rules and regulations in the controlled substances space or any other should keep tabs on activity at OIRA.

Because of this agenda I can tell you, for example, that DEA currently has unpublished proposed or final rules for:

  • Telemedicine Prescribing of Controlled Substances When the Practitioner and the Patient Have Not Had An In-Person Evaluation
  • DEA Registration for Religious Organizations under the Religious Freedom for Restoration Act
  • Analytical Labs and Hemp
  • Medical Marijuana and Cannabidiol Research Expansion
  • Implementation of the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018

Rules are, in a few words, one way agencies implement statutes. First, Congress passes a law and delegates authority to the agency to implement it. Second, the agency works on developing a rule to implement the law. Third, the agency publishes its implementation.

Usually, but not always, an agency will post a “proposed rule” seeking public comment. A proposed rule is just that: a proposal. This is the usual course. Agencies propose rules and finalize them. After the public comment period on a proposed rule ends, the agency reviews the comments, explains its decisions, and publishes a final rule. With certain narrow exceptions, a final rule then becomes effective some time after its publication, usually 30 or 60 days.

Sometimes, however, an agency posts an interim final rule, which can be permitted by statute or in specific situations such as in emergencies. For example, assuming an NDA for MDMA is approved by FDA, 21 U.S.C. § 811(j)(1) requires DEA to reschedule MDMA in an interim final rule. An interim final rule becomes effective immediately or shortly after publication.

Rules are important. Recall, last year we reported that DEA disclosed to registrants at the 1st annual supply conference that it had a rule in the works governing cannabinoids, such as delta-8. Perhaps the last rule “Implementation of the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018” relates to that. Who knows? Unfortunately, while DEA sent out a save the date for this year’s conference, we don’t appear to be invited. Indeed, DEA has expressly excluded “private practice attorneys” and “consulting firms” as “not eligible to attend” “DEA-sponsored conference[ ] for industry.”

Pharma + DEA: A timeless recipe for American success

In the remainder of this post I will discuss how we know all this—Executive Order 12866—which requires the production of a Unified Regulatory Agenda and Regulatory Plan. And I will show you how you, too, can become a regulatory guru…

Subscribe to On Drugs to read the rest.

Become a paying subscriber of On Drugs to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content.

Top 200 Cannabis Lawyers

We Support

Cannabis Law Journal – Contributing Authors

Editor – Sean Hocking

Author Bios

Canada
Matt Maurer – Minden Gross
Jeff Hergot – Wildboer Dellelce LLP

Costa Rica
Tim Morales – The Cannabis Industry Association Costa Rica

Nicaragua
Elvin Rodríguez Fabilena

USA

General
Julie Godard
Carl L Rowley -Thompson Coburn LLP

Arizona
Jerry Chesler – Chesler Consulting

California
Ian Stewart – Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Otis Felder – Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Lance Rogers – Greenspoon Marder – San Diego
Jessica McElfresh -McElfresh Law – San Diego
Tracy Gallegos – Partner – Fox Rothschild

Colorado
Adam Detsky – Knight Nicastro
Dave Rodman – Dave Rodman Law Group
Peter Fendel – CMR Real Estate Network
Nate Reed – CMR Real Estate Network

Florida
Matthew Ginder – Greenspoon Marder
David C. Kotler – Cohen Kotler

Illinois
William Bogot – Fox Rothschild

Massachusetts
Valerio Romano, Attorney – VGR Law Firm, PC

Nevada
Neal Gidvani – Snr Assoc: Greenspoon Marder
Phillip Silvestri – Snr Assoc: Greenspoon Marder

Tracy Gallegos – Associate Fox Rothschild

New Jersey

Matthew G. Miller – MG Miller Intellectual Property Law LLC
Daniel T. McKillop – Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

New York
Gregory J. Ryan, Esq. Tesser, Ryan & Rochman, LLP
Tim Nolen Tesser, Ryan & Rochman, LLP
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Oregon
Paul Loney & Kristie Cromwell – Loney Law Group
William Stewart – Half Baked Labs

Pennsylvania
Andrew B. Sacks – Managing Partner Sacks Weston Diamond
William Roark – Principal Hamburg, Rubin, Mullin, Maxwell & Lupin
Joshua Horn – Partner Fox Rothschild

Washington DC
Teddy Eynon – Partner Fox Rothschild